Qui tam fraud litigation offers incentives for relators to share fraudulent activity with the government since both sides share awarded payouts.
Qui Tam Fraud Litigation Under the Federal False Claims Act benefits Both Relators and the Government
DURING THE CIVIL WAR, THE UNION ARMY WAS THE TARGET OF WAR PROFITEERS, individuals and companies, seeking to make a dishonest fortune at the taxpayers’ expense. In response, Congress passed the earliest version of the federal False Claims Act. This law has been amended over the years but has always been designed to take advantage of private citizens’ knowledge concerning unscrupulous activities of government contractors.
Just about any area where the federal government spends money may be the subject of contractor fraud, but the large majority of fraud aimed at the federal government is concentrated in two primary areas: healthcare and defense spending.
Any entity that provides goods or services in these areas should exercise caution in preparing its billing to ensure that fraudulent invoices or certifications will not be submitted to the government, either directly or indirectly through other contractors that will, in turn, submit the invoice to the government. If a contractor does submit a false invoice or claim to the government, the federal government may sue under the False Claims Act to recover up to three times the amount of the damages that the government suffers, together with a penalty of between $5,500 and $11,000 for each individual claim. When a case involves the submission of many claims, as is often the case in the healthcare field, these penalties can add up very quickly.
Additionally, any individual aware of fraud against the federal government may file such a lawsuit against the corrupt contractor. Such a person is called a “relator” and such litigation is called a qui tam lawsuit, from a Latin phrase that means the relator is acting both for the government as well as for him or herself. Often, but not always, the relator is an employee or former employee of the company being charged with fraud. In most cases, it is important that the person have specific knowledge of the fraud committed, including specifics such as the date claims were presented, the specific individuals that submitted the claims, the nature of the goods or services that were being purchased by the government, and what was fraudulent about the claims.
A person aware of fraud against the government has a strong incentive to bring this type of lawsuit because he or she will be entitled to share in the recovery. In most cases, the relator can receive between 15 percent and 30 percent of whatever amount the government recovers as a result of the litigation. Many of these cases result in recoveries to the government in the millions of dollars and payments to the relators in the hundreds of thousands of dollars or more.
Even fraud against the state or a local government might qualify for qui tam litigation, either under similar state law or because the state and local governments are often spending money that they receive from the federal government.
These cases are extremely complex and subject to rules that can be difficult to navigate. If you believe that you have information that could be used to file such a case, it is important to speak without delay with an attorney who is familiar with similar cases because there are specific deadlines that must be met.
If you have any questions about your situation contact us to set up a free consultation!
Matthew R. Howell began his career as an assistant United States attorney for the Federal government in Salt Lake City, Utah, prosecuting crimes against federally insured financial institutions and crimes committed on Indian reservations and federal lands. Since joining Fillmore Spencer LLC in 2005, Matt Howell has worked on cases large and small on behalf of individuals and companies. His casework includes breach of contract, fraud, criminal defense, intellectual property, real property and family law issues. He has substantial experience in representing Whistle-Blowers in cases of fraud against the government as well as extensive experience in mediation, both as an attorney and as a mediator. He has argued cases before the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Utah Supreme Court, the Utah Court of Appeals, the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, and many district and justice courts throughout the state of Utah.